Kihoto Hollohan vs. Zachillhu (1993) : Case laws
The case of Kihoto Hollohan vs. Zachillhu and Others (1993) is a landmark judgment by the Supreme Court of India that addressed the constitutional validity of the Tenth Schedule of the Indian Constitution, commonly known as the Anti-Defection Law. This case holds significant importance in the context of Indian parliamentary democracy, as it deals with the disqualification of members of Parliament and state legislatures on the grounds of defection.
The Tenth Schedule and Its Provisions
The Tenth Schedule was added to the Indian Constitution by the 52nd Amendment Act of 1985 to combat the evil of political defections. It laid down the process by which legislators could be disqualified on grounds of defection by the presiding officer of a legislature based on a petition by any other member. The provisions included disqualification for voluntarily giving up membership of the political party, voting or abstaining from voting contrary to the party’s directive, and the protection given to splits and mergers.
Petitioners and Arguments
The petitioners, including Kihoto Hollohan, challenged the constitutional validity of the Tenth Schedule on various grounds. They argued that the provisions of the Tenth Schedule violated their fundamental rights under Articles 14 (right to equality), 19(1)(a) (freedom of speech and expression), and 105 (powers and privileges of Parliament) of the Constitution. They contended that the authority given to the presiding officers was arbitrary and lacked sufficient safeguards, thereby affecting the independence of legislators.
Issues Before the Court
The Supreme Court had to address two primary issues:
1. Whether the Tenth Schedule was constitutionally valid.
2. Whether the decisions of the Speaker/Chairman regarding disqualification under the Tenth Schedule were subject to judicial review.
Supreme Court’s Judgment
The Supreme Court, in its judgment delivered on November 18, 1992, upheld the constitutional validity of the Tenth Schedule but introduced certain safeguards to ensure fairness and justice. The judgment was delivered by a five-judge Constitution Bench comprising Justices M.N. Venkatachaliah, A.M. Ahmadi, K. Jayachandra Reddy, S.C. Agrawal, and N.P. Singh.
Constitutional Validity
The Court held that the Tenth Schedule did not violate the basic structure of the Constitution. It stated that the anti-defection law was intended to curb the evil of political defections which undermined the principles of democracy and the stability of elected governments. The Court opined that the law was a reasonable restriction on the legislators’ freedom of speech and expression to maintain the integrity of the democratic process.
Judicial Review
One of the crucial aspects of the judgment was the Court’s stance on judicial review of the Speaker’s/Chairman’s decisions. The Court ruled that the decisions of the presiding officers were subject to judicial review, albeit on limited grounds. It emphasized that while the presiding officers’ decisions regarding disqualification were final, they could be challenged in a court of law on grounds of mala fides, perversity, and violation of constitutional mandates.
Impact and Significance
The judgment in **Kihoto Hollohan vs. Zachillhu** has had a profound impact on the functioning of the Indian political system. By upholding the Tenth Schedule, the Supreme Court reinforced the importance of party discipline and the stability of governments. At the same time, by allowing limited judicial review, it ensured that the powers of the presiding officers were not absolute and were subject to scrutiny in case of misuse or arbitrariness.
Kihoto Hollohan v. Zachillhu : Conclusion
The Kihoto Hollohan case is a landmark in Indian constitutional law, striking a balance between maintaining political stability and protecting the rights of legislators. It upholds the spirit of the anti-defection law while ensuring that the power to disqualify members is exercised judiciously and is subject to judicial oversight. This judgment continues to play a crucial role in shaping the contours of parliamentary democracy in India.
🎓🚀 Hey, Attention law students!
Ready to level up your game?
Say goodbye to missed opportunities
Get instant updates on internships, jobs, and law Competitions.
Join our vibrant legal community with 5000+ members already onboard!
Click here for WhatsApp Groups (Click HERE) and Telegram Channel (Click HERE). and get timely updates.
Don’t wait, join the coolest legal crew now! 📲🌟
