Delay in Filing Complaint Under Section 498A IPC Doesn’t Negate Husband’s Cruelty: Supreme Court

Jaydeepsinh Pravinsinh Chavda & Ors. v. State of Gujarat

About the Case:

In a landmark judgment, the Supreme Court reaffirmed that a delay in filing a complaint under Section 498A of the Indian Penal Code (IPC) does not undermine the charges of cruelty against the husband or his relatives. The Court held that sufficient evidence was presented demonstrating the appellants’ acts of cruelty towards the deceased, which included harassment over her gold ornaments and streedhan.

While the Court dismissed the charge under Section 306 IPC (abetment of suicide), citing the absence of direct causation between the alleged harassment and the deceased’s tragic suicide, it permitted the trial to continue under Section 498A IPC for cruelty.

---

Case Overview:

The appellants, comprising the deceased’s husband and his relatives, were accused under Sections 306 and 498A of IPC following the suicide of the deceased, who had been married to the appellant since 2009. The case revolved around allegations of physical and emotional abuse by the appellants, primarily over the deceased’s streedhan (gold ornaments). The deceased tragically took her own life by hanging on April 18, 2021, following prolonged mistreatment.

The deceased’s father lodged a police complaint detailing the abuse. As a result, the appellants faced charges of abetment of suicide (Section 306) and cruelty (Section 498A IPC).

---

Key Issues Addressed by the Court:

1. Cruelty Under Section 498A – The Court acknowledged that continuous harassment and emotional abuse, particularly regarding streedhan, constituted cruelty.
2. Abetment of Suicide (Section 306) – The Court found no proximate link between the deceased’s suicide and the alleged harassment, resulting in the discharge of the appellants under Section 306.

---

Significance of the Judgment:

This ruling underscores the broad scope of Section 498A IPC in addressing not just physical violence but also emotional and psychological abuse within marriages. The decision reinforces that:

• Mental harassment and financial abuse over streedhan can amount to cruelty.
• Delayed complaints do not invalidate claims of cruelty.
• Prosecution for cruelty under Section 498A can proceed independently of abetment of suicide charges.

The case sets a precedent for similar instances, reinforcing the legal recourse available to victims of domestic cruelty.

---

Also Read:

• 15th SLCU-CAM International Environmental Law Moot Court Competition 2025
• Internship Opportunity at the Chambers of Adv. Nitin Kamble
• Training Program by LawInternships
• Legal Internship at Kohli and Kohli Law Associates
• Research Internship Opportunity at Lok Sabha MP Office
• Call for Papers by Legal House Law Journal

This judgment serves as a reminder of the critical role legal frameworks play in safeguarding the rights and dignity of women, reinforcing the necessity for continued legal advocacy and awareness.