Introduction

The legal profession has long been dominated by men, particularly in leadership roles within bar associations and councils. However, the fight for inclusivity in bar bodies has gained momentum, especially with the Supreme Court of India’s intervention. The landmark decision in 2024 to implement women’s reservation in bar associations and councils marked the beginning of a transformative shift in legal leadership.

This article delves into the journey of women lawyers who challenged the status quo, the systemic barriers they faced, and the impact of the Supreme Court’s ruling on gender representation in the legal profession.

The State of Women’s Representation in Bar Councils

Despite progress in various professional fields, the legal sector has struggled to ensure gender representation. The State Bar Councils, constituted under Section 3 of the Advocates Act, 1961, regulate the profession and serve as the governing bodies for lawyers across India. However, a 2021 study found that only 2.04% of the elected representatives in these councils were women—a statistic that has barely improved over the years.

Women remain underrepresented in leadership positions within bar associations and councils, facing systemic barriers such as financial constraints, networking disadvantages, and social biases.

Challenges Women Lawyers Face in Leadership Elections

Senior Advocate Indira Jaising, a staunch advocate for gender equality in the legal profession, highlighted the key reasons behind the lack of women in bar leadership roles:

• Financial Constraints: Bar council elections require substantial financial backing, and women lawyers often lack the resources to run competitive campaigns.
• Networking Barriers: The male-dominated nature of legal networks makes it challenging for women to secure electoral support.
• Gender Bias & Stereotypes: Women in leadership positions frequently face sexist remarks and scrutiny regarding their interactions with male colleagues.

The Legal Battle for Women’s Reservation in Bar Associations

In 2024, a group of women lawyers, determined to break these barriers, initiated legal proceedings for gender-based reservation in bar associations. The Supreme Court’s directive to the Supreme Court Bar Association (SCBA) to adopt a rotational system of reservation for women in executive positions was a pivotal moment in this movement.

This set the stage for further petitions, particularly in the Delhi High Court Bar Association (DHCBA), where women lawyers sought similar representation. The petitioners included:

• Fozia Rahman
• Aditi Chaudhary
• Shobha Gupta

Rahman and Gupta filed separate petitions, while Chaudhary intervened in the proceedings before the Delhi High Court. When the High Court refused to grant interim relief for upcoming elections, Chaudhary escalated the matter to the Supreme Court.

Impact of the Supreme Court’s Ruling

The Supreme Court’s order fundamentally changed the legal landscape by enforcing women’s reservation in bar bodies. The ruling emphasized that diversity in leadership is essential for inclusive decision-making and structural transformation in the legal profession.

According to Advocate Harshita Singhal, who represented Chaudhary, the decision was just the beginning of a larger movement. She stressed that the goal was not only to increase women’s presence in bar associations but also to ensure real, tangible changes in legal governance.

Key Outcomes of the Supreme Court’s Directive

1. Mandatory Reservation: Bar bodies must ensure a certain percentage of seats are reserved for women.
2. Treasurer Positions for Women: The Supreme Court directed that Treasurer posts in bar councils be reserved for women candidates.
3. Precedent for Future Movements: Karnataka’s Advocates Association, Bengaluru (AAB) canceled its elections to implement the reservation policy, setting a precedent for other states.

Resistance & The Road to Change

Like any major structural reform, the ruling was met with resistance from certain sections of the legal fraternity. Patriarchy instinctively defends itself, says Harshita, adding that many male lawyers perceived the reservation policy as a threat to their dominance in bar bodies.

However, she also highlighted that resistance often signals progress. The more entrenched systems feel challenged, the more they react—a sign that meaningful change is underway.

The Need for Intersectional Representation

While gender-based reservations are a critical step, true inclusivity requires an intersectional approach that accounts for caste, class, and economic backgrounds.

Harshita outlined several measures to ensure equitable representation in bar councils:

• Intersectional Leadership: Ensuring leadership positions reflect diversity beyond gender.
• Financial Accessibility: Capping election spending to allow women from underprivileged backgrounds to participate.
• Mentorship Programs: Providing structured mentorship for first-generation women lawyers to bridge networking gaps.
• Inclusive Decision-Making: Encouraging participation from historically marginalized communities.

A New Era of Legal Leadership

The Supreme Court’s intervention marks a turning point in the fight for gender representation in the legal profession. This change isn’t just about having more women in leadership roles—it’s about normalizing their presence so that future generations of lawyers see it as the standard, not the exception.

Women’s reservation in bar bodies is not just symbolic; it’s a structural shift that will lead to:

1. More inclusive policies, such as better sexual harassment redressal mechanisms and childcare support for independent practitioners.
2. Greater participation of women in decision-making, ensuring fair representation in legal governance.
3. A ripple effect, inspiring women in other states to fight for similar reforms in their jurisdictions.

Conclusion

The legal profession must reflect the diversity it seeks to uphold. Women’s reservation in bar councils is not just a victory for women lawyers but a victory for justice, fairness, and progress.

With states like Karnataka already implementing these reforms, a nationwide transformation seems inevitable. The fight is far from over, but one thing is clear: the era of male-dominated bar leadership is coming to an end.

Call to Action

As more women step into leadership roles, bar associations across India must actively implement policies that:

• Encourage mentorship and financial assistance for women candidates
• Foster inclusive decision-making at all levels
• Ensure long-term sustainability of gender diversity in legal leadership

The legal fraternity must move beyond mere lip service and work toward genuine gender inclusivity. After all, a profession dedicated to justice and equality must embody those values within its own ranks.

https://wp.me/peEAVD-4Bx